Did SNL Change Their Al Sharpton Script To Avoid Truth?

In the latest SNL episode, which featured Mick Jagger, one sketch has a laughable Al Sharpton, played by Kenan Thompson. As someone who multitasks while watching TV shows on Hulu, I often put on the captions while I watch. What struck me as odd was when I heard “Sharpton” say “When I’m not doing this show, all I do is play Draw Something and sample olive oil relaxants at the barber shop.”

Probably true, no doubt.

But what’s interesting is that the caption below it said “Look, since this George Zimmerman thing settled, all I do is….”

That’s not what Kenan/”Al” actually said.

It would make sense that the caption are pre-written so that they can be available on Hulu when the video goes public (usually a day after its TV release)… so did the SNL writers or crew change the lines at the last minute (that is, after the captions were written)? Was some sane person silenced for attempting to call out Sharpton’s ridiculous Zimmerman-related incidents?

I’d sure like to know.

UPDATE:

I’ve reached the end of the Mick Jagger episode, when he launches into a blues song with Jeff Beck about the presidential election.
It starts off pretty well, until he calls Mitt Romney a “Mitch,” and warns all viewers to “never let him cut your hair.”

What the hell. Did no one hear that the family and Mitt both denied that any bullying incident took place back in 1965? But Obama’s self-confessed “bullying” was just tabled immediately? That’s ignorance and hypocrisy from the left, as usual.

Jagger then assures the audience that “in six months, [Mitt]‘ll be shouting “honey, won’t you let me out of this mess.”"

Well, Mick, you know what? We will fight until the very last second. We will fight until every bone in our bodies break, because we will not stop to restore our country’s honor, freedom, and economy.

We will fight.

Debating Young Liberals: Using History And Facts To Win

Some of my liberal buddies (and even a few conservative pals) decided to actually conjure some sort of defense for Barack Obama, so I shut them down with the following “comment.”

First, however, let me show you what they said. I’ve removed everyone’s names, so no worries.

*My post on Facebook*
College tuition rates in the United States have increased by 25.19% since President Obama took office. Student loan debt in this country is 1 TRILLION dollars. Where are the solutions?

Their answers:
Don’t go blaming Obama, he proposed not raising the tuition but congress fucked it up soooooo, yeah

Dude most of your posts are extremely impartial…all u do is blame Obama for everything

One of my favorite – this really shows the leftist idea of tolerance:
most of the loans belong to retards who graduate with art/history majors

A troubled conservative friend:
I’d just like to say that it’s impossible for a democratic president to do anything with a republican controlled congress and there is no way that any president can fix all of the issues in just 4 years…
More ignorance (or just being subject to brainwashing by liberal teachers, as I’ve outlined before)
if you are going to blame the president then alberto the economic crisis that we are in now was started under bush so..
Let alone 2 years, he has proposed legislation. Congress did not pass it bc of the 50/50 split. If you were so politicaly saavy you’d know Obama has tried to stop it.

My comment (my favorite paragraph is the last one):

You can’t fix all the issues in 4 years, but you can at least make a lot of progress. Many presidencies have made significant progress within the first term, whereas others have failed miserably (Ford and Carter, for example). You can definitely compromise, and since I /am/ politically savvy, I do know that there have been jobs acts that have been passed, even this year, in compromise. But there’s a limit, and when your country has so much debt (you know, it’s only slightly larger than our economy) and you have a president who has been duped by a failed ideology that never works (examples: African-Americans, inner cities, Detroit), well, how can you accomplish anything?

The economic crisis can actually be traced back to Clinton. He wanted houses to be more affordable to minorities and the like (a good idea, undoubtedly), but he went about it by essentially bullying Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other banks into giving our SUBPRIME mortgages. The ensuing housing bubble that was created as the economy increased (under Bush) eventually popped (because people couldn’t pay their mortgages any more, not to mention the face that people borrowed too much and went into credit card/mortgage debt). So don’t even bullshit me for ONE second.
http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/subprime.htm
http://pithocrates.com/2011/11/06/bill-clinton-created-the-subprime-mortgage-crisis-with-his-policy-statement-on-discrimination-in-lending/

Obama did try to stop the economic crisis. He passed several stimulus bills – which all pretty much turned out to be ineffective, save for about a million jobs (which is a tiny part of the workforce). He passed the Obama-GOP tax cuts – a compromise. He passed Dodd-Frank, which really harms business more than helps it, and he passed Obamacare, which is horrendous towards business. He also passed the bailouts, which were a wonderful example of government favoritism (crony capitalism) that cost taxpayers billions of dollars – you know, the same sort of thing that Occupy and the Tea Party are protesting.

He has also kept the corporate tax rate at 35%, which is the highest in the world. Cutting that would get GOP support very quickly. He also has proposed to raise taxes on the rich by double digits, even though the richest people in this country already contribute to 70% of the money that the federal government takes in (which only 53% of the population that can pay taxes actually do, mostly because of dumb loopholes – and no, most of those people are not rich people, but poor and middle-class folks). He also shut down offshore drilling and decreased onshore federal drilling – which prevented job growth (just check out North Dakota’s unemployment rate, which is so low because of oil and natural gas investment). He also put a stop to the Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring millions of barrels of Canadian oil to the US and create 20,000 American jobs – much better than our continued purchases of oil that’s been artificially raised in price by a false shortage created by OPEC nations, like Iran and Saudi Arabia).

————————————————————————————————————

This is why I blog. To hopefully educate someone out there to see the light (which I did) and become a conservative – which I did.

UPDATE:
Both Reppundit and I have now gotten into this fight. We won’t back down. Updated comments:

Reppundit:
I think that the Heritage foundations report on Collegiate education and its solutions to fix the ever-growing tuition rate is a good read. http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/02/higher-education-assessing-the-presidents-proposal-on-college-tuition-costs

Fixing issues caused by careless defense spending for an oil interest war (Iraq) isnt simple. See people call Obama a “socialist”(which isnt bad in any sense, just republicans all hyped up because it inst capitalism), yet he is a crony capitalist?

FDR didnt fix much in his first term, yet he ended up serving three terms and became one of the most celebrated presidents of all time.

Dont give me any of the keyline oil crap, you cant propose such a huge investment with little time for him to review it. The issue with Republicans is there self absorbed interests and lack of open minds. They are so focused on”Christianity” that they’ve become oblivious to the fact that this country does not have an official religion and that the founding fathers where all deist. They run their senate campaigns on ideals of Christianity and such but then just go and fullfill their personal wishes with that power( not saying democrats dont do it but atlest they are a bit more openminded)

Reppundit:
I suggest you watch this cartoon adaptation of F.A. Hayek’s classic treatise on the dangers of government intervention into the economy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tq2SpWPZZY

I’m sorry, I was one of the people in March to get a job and I make 8 an hour which suffices me enough. To make it clear I am anti war, anti organized religion, and anti drug.

My responses:

Issues caused by an oil-interest war?

First of all, the involvement of the USA in the Iraq war was not for oil interests. It was to remove Saddam Hussein from power, increase US influence in the region, and spread democracy. It was not for oil, and war actually troubles economies so oil prices could have increased (which they did, from time to time, but Bush actually handled that well – by allowing offshore drilling and increasing federal drilling onshore).

Socialism is bad because it crushes private enterprise, removes personal freedoms, takes away lots of money from individuals (via high taxes), and would not work in a large heterogeneous country like ours. Ever checked out the financial crises of Greece, Spain, and Italy? The London riots of the UK? The fall of the German welfare system? Those are all reasons that socialism doesn’t work. It’s a recipe for bankruptcy.
FDR also placed us into a recession in the middle of the Depression’s recovery and had a dastardly court-packing scheme. So much for constitutional respect and balance of power. His massive spending did not solve much; it just raised morale a bit. It was the US involvement in WWII that actually pulled us out of the recession and led us to have the greatest and fastest economic growth ever.
You claim to be tolerant/open-minded as a liberal, but you seem to despise religion. Have you ever taken a gander at the First Amendment? Organized religion has been a very large catalyst for change and fixing society. The Catholic Church is still our nation’s largest social “welfare” provider, and before the 1960’s, churches helped out the poor with healthcare costs, homelessness, etc. If you disagree with religion, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t exist just because you think so.
Keyline oil crap? 20,000 jobs isn’t crap, and neither is the idea that we should support hydrocarbon fuels. Not to mention that the federal government had no investment at all in Keystone, no risk, nothing. The State Department was reviewing the environmental effects of the pipeline for THREE YEARS. That was not a “little bit of time.” Plus, liberals always praise Obama’s fast decision making when he had to make the “tough decision” to go after Bin Laden. Didn’t he have only a LITTLE BIT of time to review that? That was a much bigger decision than this, I’d say. But since this actually would move nutjob environmentalists away from him, he couldn’t do it. Zero guts, the man has.
Christian ideals are freedom (Exodus story) and being made by God to have free will. Our nation’s Declaration of Independence itself states that our Creator (a reference to God, hence the capitalization) has given us inalienable rights. Many of the Commandments were foundations for our laws. To say this country wasn’t created on Christian ideals is ridiculous. To say all the founders (or even most of them) were Deist is not accurate. Some of them promoted God and the Bible, but for the most part they remained silent beyond a support for religious toleration. For some clarification: http://www.patheos.com/Resources/Additional-Resources/Founding-Fathers-Were-Not-Deists-John-Fea-02-02-2011.html
Oh, and he practices crony capitalism by giving federal money to private corporations that suit his will – something that is similar to socialism, which is where the government controls many aspects of private enterprise.
————————————————————————————————————
Facts. Reasoning. Closing loopholes of hypocrisy. Somehow, those are strange things.

Romney Has Substantial Lead Over Obama In Florida

The good news is just going to keep on coming!

Not only can Obama not even win a majority of counties in Kentucky (he won 61, while 67 counties voted as ‘uncommitted’), he can’t even hold down other primaries. In other news, Romney’s got a 6-point lead in Florida.

Here’s the text of the article:

Mitt Romney has now taken a 6-point lead over President Barack Obama in the battleground state of Florida.

A new Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday found Romney now besting Obama 47 percent to 41 percent among likely Florida voters. That’s a shift from earlier this month when a Quinnipiac poll found Romney and Obama statistically tied in the state. In March, Obama led Romney 49 to 42 percent in the Sunshine State.

If Romney were to add Florida Sen. Marco Rubio to the ticket, the presumptive Republican nominee would expand his lead in the state only slightly, according to Quinnipiac. Forty-nine percent of Florida voters say they’d choose a Romney/Rubio ticket versus 41 percent who say they’d vote for Obama and Vice President Joe Biden. (The poll’s margin of error is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points.)

Romney’s improved standing in the state is in part due to voter angst over Obama’s job performance. Just 45 percent of Florida voters view the president favorably, compared to 50 percent who see him negatively. Fifty-two percent of Florida voters disapprove of the job Obama is doing in the White House. An equal number say the president doesn’t deserve a second term in office.

Romney’s favorable rating is one point lower than Obama’s at 44 percent, but just 35 percent view him negatively. Meanwhile, half of Florida voters say Romney would do a better job handling the economy, compared to 40 percent who prefer Obama.

But Obama still has one major advantage: Voters continue to say he’s more “likable” than Romney. Seventy-six percent say Obama is “likable” compared to 58 percent for Romney.

There’s also a great opinion piece over at Fox News that talks about Obama’s flubs with the Catholic electorate. The text of that article is below:

The news Monday that 43 different Catholic entities across the country are suing the Obama administration, in response to the Health and Human Services’ (HHS) rule mandating employer health care coverage of contraception, abortion-inducing drugs, and sterilization, comes as a blow to the president’s strength among Catholics, a demographic that helped carry him to victory in 2008.

This news comes on the heels of the the latest CBS News/New York Times poll which finds Mitt Romney now leading President Obama among women, yet another demographic that he previously commanded.

If Mr. Obama was hoping to once again rely on Catholics and women to help carry him to electoral success in 2012, it appears as though he is miscalculating.

A recent survey by the Pew Research Center shows that, despite the administration’s self-portrayal as the champion of “women’s issues” amidst a supposed Republican “war on women,” the president’s reelection advantage among women has declined in recent months as well as with another key demographic — Catholics.

Obama was ahead among Catholics by 9 points in early March, and is now trailing by 5 points.

The Pew survey finds that, among Catholic voters with an opinion, 47% would today vote for President Obama, and 52% for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.

That same margin, were it to hold on Election Day, would mark a swing of 18 million voters away from Obama.

The loss of these Catholic votes alone would remake the 2008 electoral map, delivering Florida to Governor Romney and leaving the president no margin for error in Colorado or Ohio.

Women appear to be unimpressed by the Democratic strategy of alleging a “war on women,” with the president in the role of their defender.  And that very strategy to turn women against Republicans has only served to alienate Catholic voters – including, of course, Catholic women.

The “war on women” narrative was a strategic shift, invented after polls revealed strong public support for exempting religious employers and charities from the heavy-handed HHS mandate.

The Obama administration no doubt knew it would lose some support with Catholics in the mandate. But they surely did not anticipate the strong and unified voice with which Catholic leaders, in particular bishops, responded even after the administration offered a compromise widely rejected as an accounting gimmick.

In the most comprehensive survey conducted on the issue yet, Washington-based public opinion firm QEV Analytics recently found that some 50% of regular churchgoing Catholics heard a statement during Mass setting forth the bishops’ serious misgivings about the insurance mandate. Of all the Catholics who heard this statement, most apparently agreed with it.

The administration likely gambled that minor losses with the Catholic vote would be more than compensated for by surging support from women, in particular young, single women. But the QEV findings indicate that this was a major miscalculation.

Even among women under age 45, the survey found that a majority – 54% – support the Church’s position that religious institutions should not be required to violate their own teachings.

Among women age 45 or older 58% felt the same; they question the wisdom of a mandate that would leave many faith-based charities no choice but to curtail their services to the needy, or close down altogether.

As for whether the government should single out birth control to be mandated and cost-free when so many other drugs are not, again a clear majority of women — sixty-three percent — say “no.” After all, is your mother’s blood pressure medication or your child’s asthma medicine free by federal decree?

When all of the QEV findings are added up, the mandate has yielded no advantage for the administration among the young female voters it was presumably targeting: only 17% of women under 45 say they are more likely to vote for Obama because of it, while 26% say they are less likely.

And among every other category of women, the issue turns out to be a loser, while also carrying a very tangible cost among Catholics: Twenty-nine percent say they are now less likely to vote for the president because of this issue, more than double the 13% who say it makes them more likely to support him.

For its part, reading only the approving editorials of the secular press, the Obama political team may view its election tactics with religious groups and women as working.

The administration will no doubt feel emboldened to assert yet more federal power over religious groups in a second term.

If the quickly changing sentiments among Catholics and women are any indicator of things to come, however, the administration is not going to get that chance.

Unfortunately, what follows below is something that we shouldn’t be celebrating, even though it outlines Obama’s continued failures as president. Many thanks to Crossroads Generation for finding this info. This particular post can be found here.

Young Americans face incredibly high unemployment rates, and many are giving up looking for work. Even among those young Americans with a job, many are only working part-time but are looking for full time work.

  • The unemployment rate for Americans 18-29 is 11.6% (Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics).
  • This number doesn’t include young Americans who have given up. Between Obama’s inauguration and April 2012, there are 1.4 million more young Americans who aren’t even in the workforce as employed or looking for work. (Source: BLS).
  • Thirty-two percent of 18-29 year olds in the U.S. workforce were underemployed in April 2012. Source: “One in Three Young U.S. Workers are Underemployed,” Gallup, May 9, 2012: http://www.gallup.com/poll/154553/One-Three-YoungUnderemployed.aspx)
  • When new graduates find jobs, their starting salaries tend to be lower than those who graduated a decade earlier, and may never catch up. (Source: “For Most Graduates, Grueling Job Hunt Awaits,” Wall Street Journal, May 7, 2012)
  • For Americans under 24 without a college degree, one in five who are looking for a job cannot find one. (Source: “Generation Jobless: For Those Under 24, a Portrait in Crisis,” Wall Street Journal, November 7, 2011)

Students graduating during Obama’s term in once have had it worse than students graduating before his presidency. The debt burden those graduates took on to get their degree has risen as well.

  • Fewer than half of the students who graduated from college during Obama’s presidency were able to find a full-time job within a year of graduation, compared to nearly three out of four graduates finding full time work in the years before Obama took office. (Source: “For Most Graduates, Grueling Job Hunt Awaits,” Wall Street Journal, May 7, 2012)
  • Student loan debt is now over $1 trillion. (Source: “Student Loan Debt Exceeds One Trillion Dollars,” NPR, April 24, 2012: http://www.npr.org/2012/04/24/151305380/student-loan-debt-exceeds-one-trillion-dollars)
  • Nearly two thirds of the class of 2010 graduated with debt, averaging $25,000 of debt per graduate. (Source: “For Most Graduates, Grueling Job Hunt Awaits,” Wall Street Journal, May 7, 2012)

Young Americans want to be independent, but the bad economy is keeping young Americans from living on their own and making the life choices they want.

  • Two out of three Americans aged 18 to 34 say they think that children should be financially independent from their parents by age 22. (Source: “Young, Underemployed, and Optimistic,” Pew Research Center, February 9, 2012: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2012/02/young-underemployed-and-optimistic.pdf)
  • Some 42 percent of those aged 18 to 29 who graduated from college are living with their parents. (Source: “The Boomerang Generation: Feeling OK about Living with Mom and Dad,” Pew Research Center, March 15, 2012: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2012/03/PewSocialTrends-2012-BoomerangGeneration.pdf)
  • One in five young adults postponed getting married or having a baby because of the economic pressure they face. (Source: “Young, Underemployed, and Optimistic,” Pew Research Center, February 9, 2012)

Obama’s support among young voters has fallen from where it stood in 2008.

  • According to the most recent Harvard Institute of Politics study, just barely half of young people approve of Obama’s job as president, and only 41% approve of his handling of the economy. (Source: http://www.iop.harvard.edu/Research-Publications/Survey/Spring-2012-Survey)
  • Democrats’ lead among voters under 30 fell by sixteen points from the 2008 to 2010 exit polls, from a 29 point lead on the House ballot in 2008 to a 13 point lead in 2010. (Source: Media Exit Polls, 2008 and 2010)

Lies On Obama’s Campaign Site

Barack Obama! He…

Refused to let the auto industry vanish

In 2009 President Obama prevented the collapse of an auto industry at the heart of American manufacturing—workers, management and investors all had to sacrifice. Three years later, all loans have been repaid to the federal government and U.S. automakers are hiring hundreds of thousands of new workers.

At the massive expense of you, the taxpayer (well, only 53% of those who are reading this). If all loans have been paid off, why does the US government have a 30% stake in General Motors Company?

I want an answer, Mr. President.

Also, I’d like to FactCheck you on the “hiring hundreds of thousands of new workers.” That has got to be at least 4 Pinocchios.

The BS that was quoted above comes from here. Be prepared to see lies everywhere (in the areas that aren’t extremely vague, that is).

Obama and Gay Marriage: A Timeline

Thanks to Fox News for this one.

If this doesn’t make it apparent that this was ALL pre-planned, then I don’t know what will.

Oct. 3, 2011: In Obama’s most recent public comments on gay marriage before his endorsement, the president tells ABC News that “at minimum” gay couples should have strong civil unions. He says he doesn’t plan to “make news right now” — asked whether he’d change his mind on gay marriage before the election, Obama says: “I’m still working on it.”

May 6, 2012: In an interview aired on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Vice President Biden says he’s “absolutely comfortable” with gay marriage rights.

May 7: Education Secretary Arne Duncan says in a TV interview that he thinks gay couples should be allowed to legally marry.

May 7: White House Press Secretary Jay Carney says he has “no update” on Obama’s personal views, but claims Biden was making “the same point” Obama had made previously on the rights of gay couples. Duncan, he says, was expressing a “personal opinion.”

May 9: Obama calls an interview with ABC News, and announces that in his personal view, “same-sex couples should be able to get married.”

May 10: The Obama campaign releases a web video that focuses on the gay-marriage announcement, and calls Romney “backwards on equality.”

May 10: Obama travels to Seattle for a pair of campaign fundraisers. From there, he heads to Los Angeles for another fundraiser at George Clooney’s house. The president sets a single-day fundraising record, pulling in nearly $15 million.

May 14: Obama delivers the commencement address at Barnard College, touching on the gay-marriage debate. He then tapes an interview with “The View,” where he again discusses his gay-marriage announcement. From there, he heads to two fundraisers in New York, one hosted by the LGBT Leadership Council, Ricky Martin and The Futuro Fund. At the event, Obama declares the Defense of Marriage Act should be repealed.

While the president has done well for himself at the fundraisers since his announcement, the campaign is also selling LGBT merchandise on its official website. The novelty items include shirts, posters, stickers and even a $10 “Obama Pride” can holder.

Fundraisers and online merchandise literally a few days after his announcement? This was clearly a pre-planned move on Obama’s part because Mitt Romney is leading him in the polls! Obama has lost support among women, moderates, independent, and voters overall.

It’s about the economy. It’s about the dismal unemployment rate for college kids and the workforce. This baloney was great for cash (Chump change for Obama, really, just $21 million in a week) but will probably hurt him since a majority of voters say this was a calculated move on Obama’s part.

It’s as simple as that.

Recap & Response: Obama’s Failures In The First Two Years Remembered

I just got a bit infuriated at this load of garbage titled “Republicans Across The U.S. Are Trying To Disenfranchise Voters – What Are You Going To Do About It? “

Shudder. One again, we see liberals ensuring that the only people who don’t vote on time are poor, non-white immigrants. Talk about stereotyping and seeing past race. Let’s keep on letting dead people vote, too. JFK definitely wasn’t elected by any vote tampering in Chicago, right?

Right?

Oh.


Read what I posted below (in the comments section of the above article) about Obama’s miserable failures – in just the first 2 years of his presidency!

“After all, most of the Republicans in these state legislatures rode in on then same wave of apathy and downright stupidity that allowed the Republicans to get control of the U. S. House. All those whiny people who weren’t happy that Obama didn’t do everything all at once and decided to stay home and teach him a lesson also stayed home from elections that decided who their local and state elected officials would be. And now they’re paying for it.”

Obama knew that midterms would come up. Should he have focused more on domestic issues in the first 2 years?
Probably.
But he had a failed record on domestic issues when the Dems had total control of Congress and the White House. Multiple stimulus packages, a horrendous healthcare law (that was, and still is, opposed by a majority of Americans all over the political spectrum), virtually ignoring the BP oil spill site/Gulf Coast for days – and then botching cleanup efforts between the govt and BP, a shutdown of new offshore drilling, the Dodd-Frank law, failing to close Gitmo, not being clear or inspiring on Iraq/Afghanistan, increasing the federal debt, ignoring entitlement reform, and having net job loss (Even by now, 22 months of economic ‘growth’ has not made up everything Obama lost before), all caused Democrats to be pushed back. Parties in power always get punished for bad things, even if some of them are not in the hands of the party. For our president to say he’s going to turn around everything, and then claim he never had the ability to – well, that’s just him trying to save face for the fact that his policies failed.

Everyone says that he inherited a bad economy, but he had 2 years to implement whatever policies he wanted. Two years to do whatever he wanted to turn around the economy – which he promised he would do. He blew it off, and whatever he did pass did nothing but slow industries, hamper job growth, and, frankly, piss off a majority of Americans. If you think all those people are dumb, well, you’ve been duped. Even now, his policies have had no substantial effect. Our economic growth is tiny, the dollar is weak, and the major reason unemployment has gone down is because of people leaving the workforce (specifically, it’s responsible for 4/5 of the changes to the unemployment rate). Just last week, 365,000 people applied for unemployment benefits for the first time. Not promising.

The Left Is Infected – With Romney Derangement Syndrome.

I just ran through an article over at Fox News that discusses the Romney Derangement Syndrome.

For those unfamiliar with this illness, symptoms include an inability to launch successful political attacks, a loss of focus for real issues, and constant weak hits against your opponent because you’re so weak that you can’t actually succeed with your own record.

President Obama is sick.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like we’ll have a cure for our president – except for, of course, removing him from office with the power of democratic elections. Which will indeed happen.

In fact, now that I think about it, almost all liberals seem to have RDS. They keep making false arguments about the 1% vs 99%, Big Oil subsidies (which don’t exist), modern “Jim Crow laws” – it’s all reeking of desperation. When you’re desperate, you’ll make the most ridiculous claims with the biggest rhetoric possible in order to score points. They’re waving their bloody shirts at us, really – but it doesn’t seem as though they’re winning the narrative. The age of the Internet has not, as some stupid YouTube commentators have told me, decreased conservatism, but has empowered us. Now, more than ever, we can share the exact details of cruel abortion procedures. We can create economic models and predict future deficits. We can keep textbook writers from rewriting history by giving a voice to what has really happened in our country.

Oh yes, the RDS is widespread among the left. Let’s keep it that way. We’ll win.

Union Power Exposed. Their Wallets Are Deep. I Mean DEEP.

You think the freakin’ unions have no power?

You’re delusional.

Now, I’m not going to talk too much, so that we can skip to the raw numbers. However, you ought to know that I’ve been tracking donations to 527 groups (tax-exempt political organizations) since early last December. The post that I made that tracked donations from last December to the end of this past January is here. When I checked back at the start of March, I didn’t find any different numbers. Without further ado, the numbers – after 2 months of no updating.

The numbers from my last post:

Contributor Total
Plumbers/Pipefitters Union $631,408
American Fedn of St/Cnty/Munic Employees $510,000
American Federation of Teachers $393,611
Ctzns for Better Schs In Support of Sanc $370,387
Sazerac Co $300,000
United Food & Commercial Workers Union $300,000
Democracy For America $271,214
Teamsters Union $265,194
United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners $253,175
Friess Assoc $250,000
Chief Oil & Gas $250,000
John Templeton Foundation $232,000
American Dental Assn $205,986
EMILY’s List $201,000
GFI Group $200,000
Brico Fund/Time Out Enterprises $195,000
Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $180,020
National Assn of Realtors Members $172,500
Iabsoriw $150,000
Renaissance Technologies $150,000
Citadel Investment Group $150,000
Sheet Metal Workers Union $150,000

The numbers as of today, May 1st, 2012 (with increased donations marked in green and unions marked in boldface).

Contributor Total
Service Employees International Union $4,404,000
Plumbers/Pipefitters Union $2,275,643
United Food & Commercial Workers Union $1,701,128
Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc $1,402,075
American Federation of Teachers $1,232,777
American Fedn of St/Cnty/Munic Employees $1,130,060
Operating Engineers Union $1,122,500
Carpenters & Joiners Union $961,884
National Assn of Realtors $846,695
Perry Homes $750,000
Bluegrass Democratic Attorney Generals $590,000
Laborers Union $495,445
John Templeton Foundation $432,000
American Dental Assn $420,215
Ironworkers Union $375,000
Citizens for Better Schools for Sanchez $370,387
EMILY’s List $350,500
Elliott Management $345,000
Democracy For America $331,933
AFL-CIO $320,000

Only one group did not increase donations. Before, there were 8 unions on the list. Now, there are 11 up there.

Since the last time I checked (just over two months ago):

The SEIU was not even on the list before – so they must have made at least $4.254 million in contributions.

The Plumbers/Pipefitters Union made over $1.644 million in contributions.

The United Food & Commercial Workers Union donated over $1.401 million.

The American Federation of Teachers? Over $949,000.

The American Federation of State/County/Municipality Employees? They gave at least $621,000.

The Operating Engineers Union (another group that just showed up on the list) contributed more than $972,000.

The Carpenters and Joiners Union (aka United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners?) Over $708,000.

The Laborers Union (a newbie to the list)? Looks like $345,000+ is their magic number.

The Ironworkers Union (also debuting here)? $225,000+ is what they forked over.

The AFL-CIO (once again, a newcomer) gave over $170,000.

Remember, for those who are new to the list, I’ve had to subtract away $149,999 from their donations, since the previous lists bottomed out at $150,000.

The total donations from unions over the last two months: Over $11,289,000. That’s eleven million, two hundred and eighty-nine thousand dollars.

The total donations overall from unions on this list: $14,974,612.   Updated (I had previously not included donations from unions knocked off the list): $15,577,826
Fifteen million, five hundred seventy-seven thousand, eight hundred and twenty-six dollars.

Given the unions’ reputations to donate mostly to Democrats, you can be assured that most of this money went to defeating conservatives nationwide.


Teamsters and the Sheet Metal Workers Union got knocked off the list – maybe they’ll make a comeback over the next month. Who knew watching this could be so much fun? And also so painful?

After all, not only has the number of people using food stamps increased twofold under President Obama, but the number of people in poverty has increased by 8 million. I guess that doesn’t bother these unions too much though.


Source: Open Secrets

Spotlight: (Young) Conservatives Against Savage

I got some substantial views today from my anti-Dan Savage pieces (here and here), so I decided to spotlight some other conservatives who are fighting the fight against the left!

The first is Amy Miller, a law student who hands it to the left with some good writing, actual reasoning skills (something not often found among those of us who are products of the liberal public education system), and  – get ready for it – logic. Amy’s blog is here. One of her latest posts is about Dan Savage, so be sure to check it out. You can probably ignore the dumb liberal comments at the bottom of the page – unless you’d like to reply to their idiocy like I did.

Another is a blogger who goes by the name “Taoist.” This blogger isn’t actually a Taoist, but is someone who believes strongly in our democratic republic, free-market capitalism, and freedom (you know, things that the Left consistently fights against). Their blog is here – be sure to read if you’re into common sense!

Keep up the fight! The Left’s narrative is unraveling at last, but our work is not done!

Scumbag Dan Savage Speech Exposed. We’ll Get You, Loser

“I never felt more hurt, felt persecuted,” Mulder said. “For me, my faith is what I Want to be defined by. For someone to say it was B.S. is really hurtful. I felt put down and bullied because of my faith.”

My friend Todd Starnes, who wrote one of my favorite recent books (Dispatches from Bitter America), wrote an article over at Fox News (the only network to have a headline about this issue) on the recent Dan Savage speech at a national conference for high school journalists.

I’m not a Christian. But this speech was absolutely appalling.

It’s quite ironic how Savage founded the “It Gets Better” movement, yet he absolutely burns Christians and the Bible. Typical leftist behavior – everyone who disagrees with you ought to be silenced. “Free speech?” Pffft.

Check out some excerpts from Todd’s article below:

Naman was growing increasingly uncomfortable with the tone and tenor of Savage’s remarks. There were more lewd comments, profane words and innuendo. And then, Savage said something that made Naman take notice.

“The Bible,” Savage said with a elongated pause.

“”The very second he said the Bible and paused, I knew it was going to get ugly,” Naman told Fox News. “It was about to be a bashing.”

And Naman was absolutely correct.

“We can learn to ignore the bullshit in the Bible about gay people – the same way we have learned to ignore the bullshit in the Bible about shellfish, about slavery, about dinner, about farming, about menstruation, about virginity, about masturbation,” Savage told the young students. “We ignore bullshit in the Bible about all sorts of things.”

Unbelievable. A HIGH SCHOOL conference. Unbelievable.

The 18-year-old Eagle Scout and captain of the high school track team rose to his feet – and walked out – passing by hundreds of other students who were cheering the anti-bullying advocate’s profanity-laced rant.

“I felt like in my heart I couldn’t just stay there at all,” he said. “It was a really weird feeling I just had to get out. I didn’t want to cause a scene but I really could not stand to be in that room anymore.”

Jake Naman said he felt – bullied.

There you have it. There were even people cheering on Savage. Sick.

“If Dan Savage had gotten up there and said ‘God hates homosexuals and they’re all going to hell,’ there would have been huge outrage from that crowd,” he said. “As Christians we get the other side of that. When our faith is attacked like that – we are ridiculed for taking a stand against it.”

Naman thought that he was the only person who walked out – but when he got to the lobby – he learned that was far from the case. Arrowhead’s entire yearbook staff followed his lead – including his 16-year-old sister.

Apparently, Savage released some sort of half-apology over the weekend related to the following comment:

“You can tell the Bible guys in the hall they can come back now because I’m done beating up the Bible,” he said. “It’s funny as someone on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansy-assed people react when you push back.”

He said he wasn’t calling the students pansy-assed, but the walk-out. Sure. I really don’t see how you can twist it that way – he was definitely referring to the students.

But not all high schoolers are stupid idiots. Some realized the big points that came out of this:

“He was completely insulting and degrading our faith,” his sister said.

Mulder said Savage needed to practice what he preaches.

“I felt it was ironic coming from a person who was talking about not bullying,” she said.

Dan – you suck.