• Enter your email address to follow us! You'll get notifications in your inbox.

    Join 2,806 other followers

  • Click to follow Alberto!

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Give Me Your “Fair Share” of Pageviews

Seriously, why do we all keep saying “fair share” in regards to the Buffett Rule? To make the rich pay even higher rates? Or  is  was the Buffett Rule just designed to stop those several hundred people who escape taxes with strange loopholes? I’m not sure what “fair” refers to, but it sounds like some Marxist sound bite.

See, this is why I supported Rick’s tax plan. It called for almost all deductions to be eliminated – after all, deductions favor the rich. And while I’m not one to always dwell in the past, I do find myself taking a liking to Lisa Graas’ Operation Delaware.

And here is a cool post I just found.

Let’s go, patriots! As I said before, Rick might win at least 8 or 9 more states – especially since a lot of would-be Romney voters will stay at home. I’m sure they figure that their vote will not matter. of course, this thinking is always faulty. I hope they do think that way though. We need a conservative platform this election cycle, and we need to deliver a conservative message everywhere, up and down the ticket.

NEWS: A Week Without Media Lies

I know, one wouldn’t think this to be possible.

However, Rick Santorum will be taking a break from the campaign trail until Monday, April 9.

All the dumb conspiracy theorists/people eager to aid in the re-election of Obama will just say this is because Rick will assess how he is going to lose the nomination and will just decide to “line up” or “coalesce” behind Mitt Romney and exit the race in a “respectable fashion.”

Personally, I think his campaign needs to reorganize, and turn into a more lethal fighting machine. He also deserves a break – he’s only taken 5 days off the trail since last June. Considering it’s a holiday for him, it’s a great time for a break.


Pennsylvania, here we come. The heat’s being turned up on Romney, but not Santorum:

“If there was a poll tomorrow that said Americans wanted a Rastafarian for president, Mitt Romney would have dreadlocks by the end of the day,” said state Sen. Daylin Leach (D., Montgomery), referring to frequent criticism that the former governor has changed positions. Again, no mention of Santorum.

Source here

For those unfamiliar with Rastafarians, click here for a definition. Think Marley.

But, as I’ve been stressing: If the Dems focus on Romney, but we nominate Santorum, we have just ELIMINATED 12 months of anti-Romney work being done by the left. A YEAR of attacks – gone. The shorter we make the general election, the better for us.

Delegate Math Revealed! Use Your Brains, Vote Rick!

My good friend (if by “friend” you mean “I barely know her”) Lisa Graas just posted a piece talking abut how Romney’s campaign will never deny that he supported the mandate.

Because he used to claim that the mandate was a conservative idea.

Which is Barack’s main point in his ObamaRomneyCare bill.

So Barack is, according to MittWillard, gaining Conservative Points. We could even make a tally, with a scoreboard! Hmm… Let’s see… A flip-flop counts as half a point… Carry the two… Well, to sum it up, Obama has only one Conservative Point.

Unfortunately, we have to take into account the weight system here. You didn’t think this would be easy, did you?

Five hermit crabs times 12.99 for a bouquet of roses, add that to the cost of gas ($4 per gallon – or, in the near future, quart)… rationalize the denominator…. Ahh, I give up! Let’s just give Obama a random number – 6. Sounds about right.

By the way, that’s how they do delegate math over at the Associated Press.

Well, Of Course I CAN’T Get An Instalanche. I’m Too Commonsense.

Yes, and my commonsense stems from the fact that, once we nominate yet another moderate guy, we will lose.

Again.

Like in 2008.

And 1996.

And 1976.

Those years bring back such great memories, don’t they? Ahh….


Fact of the matter is, the people supporting Romney are supporting him on bogus reasons. As Daniel Mitchell from Townhall.com just recently wrote, Romney’s problems lie deeper than stupid gaffes by his ridiculous campaign staff or treatment of his family’s dog in 1983. For those who missed the memo on the story, here’s a snippet from Wikipedia:

Seamus was enclosed in a carrier on the roof of the Romney family’s station wagon. Sometime during the trip, the dog became afflicted with diarrhea, causing excrement to flow down the windows of the car. Romney stopped at a gas station to wash Seamus and the car, put Seamus back in his carrier, and continued the twelve-hour trip to Ontario.

Lovely.


The following links are all from Daniel Mitchell, outlining Romney’s failures on:

  • Value Added Tax
  • (Statist) Romneycare – Although, to be fair, I’m sure the Supreme Court will uphold Obamacare in a complete political move without regard for the Constitutionality of the law
  • Social Security
  • Ethanol Subsidies (Santorum has said that he will BAN all energy and most agricultural subsidies. It’s right here on his website)
  • Keynesian economics (Santorum has opposed all bailouts, including TARP. Romney supported the Wall St. Bailout but refused Detroit a bailout. Hypocrisy?)
  • Fighting budget and debt problems
  • Indexing the minimum wage with inflation (FYI, this is a liberal position)

Pretty long list, huh?

Wait, it gets better. My list here details Romney’s flaws on a range of issues, including abortion, gun rights, healthcare, and more.

Here‘s a letter written last year to Mitt Romney from a member of Gun Owners of America. It’s not pro-Mitt. Here are the GOA ratings for each candidate in the race – Romney has the lowest grade, a D minus.

Don’t worry though, Mitt’s got a lot of endorsements from RINOs, like Huntsman, Trump, and John McCain. How reassuring.


Of course, it’s not as though the Obama team is sitting on a swath of material to attack Mitt Romney with. Oh, that’s right! They do! They’ve already practically got their campaign ads ready.

I’m rather unsure as to why anyone would want to nominate a candidate that’s been attacked for months. It’s like creating a product for sale while knowing that your rival companies already know its technical flaws, weak points, and extensively covered-up problems.

Anyways, that’s why I WON’T get an Instalanche. I understand the fact that nominating a moderate will make us lose more than some other GOP folks – namely, the establishment moderates, RINOs, and the disillusioned. If you honestly think that most average voters would pick Mitt Romney over Barack Obama, you’re literally in la-la land.

But, I guess I’m just a ridiculous person who should just sell out his values and commonsense and just start supporting Romney. After all, shouldn’t everyone be eager to see a war of teleprompters, since the war on teleprompters will end?

Short Update on Huntsman, etc.

Quick update:
Jon Hunstman, Jr. will be dropping out of the race for the GOP nomination today, and is set to endorse Mitt Romney. However, Hunstman has been polling at 1.4% in South Carolina, so it’s not like this changes anything except the setup of the stage for tonight’s debate.

We love feedback! Follow on Twitter! @BestSocialPrgrm, @Reppundit

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,806 other followers

%d bloggers like this: