• Enter your email address to follow us! You'll get notifications in your inbox.

    Join 2,806 other followers

  • Click to follow Alberto!

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

The “no-no” word, Profit.

For the first time in American history the word “profit” is becoming a pejorative, largely due to the ever increasing animosity of the American people against the fat-cat Wall-Street Executives and the lavish lifestyles of the Rich. But how did this deep division arise in in the Union where even our seal boldly states “E Pluribus unum” (“Out of many, one”)?

Economic turbulence is one reason many scholars and social scientists offer to explain this lack of unity in the nation, but I believe this hostility was greatly exacerbated by the vitriolic rhetoric spouted by the Liberal base. It is their entire goal to pit one group against another in order to advance their own political goals of utopia. You hear many liberals, like President Obama, championing that the wealthy need to pay their “fair share” because they gain from the work of others. Central to the psyche of Liberal thought is the belief that more government is needed to distribute wealth so as to reach economic equality. But what that accomplishes is the creation a nanny-state where people are entirely dependent on the government that they cannot possibly survive on their own.
That utopian goal has done wonders for America’s model city, Detroit, right? Wrong. People would whole-heartedly sell their freedoms to achieve a false sense of security, and in the void of liberty, a more totalitarian government follows. This warning is not some crack-pot conspiracy theory: the same thing occurred in 1900’s Russia, where some disillusioned Bolsheviks overthrew the Russian Republic to form the now infamous (and nonexistent) USSR. What started out as a socialist victory quickly turned into a totalitarian state headed by a dictator.
But I digress. What really troubled me was the negative ad targeted at Mitt Romney during his stint at Bain Capital. It depicts how countless people lost their jobs due to Bain’s ‘heinous’ actions, but alas there is a side of the story that many do not know: how the increased competition and lower price of Chinese steel manufacturers would have resulted in the closing down of the US steel mills REGARDLESS of the intervention of Bain Capital, and how the multitudinous of pensions, charities, and personal investments greatly benefitted from these actions. But of course mainstream media wouldn’t talk about this story because they’re more worried about how Mitt Romney spends his own money rather than how Obama spends ours.

There is increased division in the nation differing entirely from when President Obama famously said, “There is not a liberal America and a conservative America – there is the United States of America. There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America and Asian America – there’s the United States of America.” It is my personal belief that this is how America should be, but Obama’s rhetoric compared to his actions tells a completely different story, one of a man trying to divide America.

For the first time in American history the word “profit” is becoming a pejorative, largely due to the ever-increasing animosity of the American people against the fat-cat Wall-Street Executives and the lavish lifestyles of the Rich. But how did this deep division arise in in the Union were even our seal boldly states “E Puluribus unum” (“Out of many, one”)?

#FireObama

#HowToPissOffADemocrat Hey! Let’s quote Obama from four years ago!

Mr. Obama said he would fight for the middle class and the he wants voters to four years from now judge that he worked hard and think, “The guy … may not have gotten everything perfect but we are moving in the right direction.”
From here, a 2009 Washington Times article.

So…  any of you feeling like we’ve moved in the right direction?

Well, the Obama team has reassured us that we are moving “Forward.”

The increased numbers of people on food stamps (apparently it’s the cool thing, like a modern version of smack ) and the fact that now 1 out of every 6 Americans is in poverty are steps in the Marxist direction that, to be honest, is probably the President’s vision. How else could he explain that this is the right direction?

You can’t tout a cake that tastes like crap as being “what we all wanted,” unless you admit that you are, in fact, trying to poison us.

Come on! The Obamas aren’t trying to poison us!

Right?

I feel better already.

#WeWillWin

Obama and Gay Marriage: A Timeline

Thanks to Fox News for this one.

If this doesn’t make it apparent that this was ALL pre-planned, then I don’t know what will.

Oct. 3, 2011: In Obama’s most recent public comments on gay marriage before his endorsement, the president tells ABC News that “at minimum” gay couples should have strong civil unions. He says he doesn’t plan to “make news right now” — asked whether he’d change his mind on gay marriage before the election, Obama says: “I’m still working on it.”

May 6, 2012: In an interview aired on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Vice President Biden says he’s “absolutely comfortable” with gay marriage rights.

May 7: Education Secretary Arne Duncan says in a TV interview that he thinks gay couples should be allowed to legally marry.

May 7: White House Press Secretary Jay Carney says he has “no update” on Obama’s personal views, but claims Biden was making “the same point” Obama had made previously on the rights of gay couples. Duncan, he says, was expressing a “personal opinion.”

May 9: Obama calls an interview with ABC News, and announces that in his personal view, “same-sex couples should be able to get married.”

May 10: The Obama campaign releases a web video that focuses on the gay-marriage announcement, and calls Romney “backwards on equality.”

May 10: Obama travels to Seattle for a pair of campaign fundraisers. From there, he heads to Los Angeles for another fundraiser at George Clooney’s house. The president sets a single-day fundraising record, pulling in nearly $15 million.

May 14: Obama delivers the commencement address at Barnard College, touching on the gay-marriage debate. He then tapes an interview with “The View,” where he again discusses his gay-marriage announcement. From there, he heads to two fundraisers in New York, one hosted by the LGBT Leadership Council, Ricky Martin and The Futuro Fund. At the event, Obama declares the Defense of Marriage Act should be repealed.

While the president has done well for himself at the fundraisers since his announcement, the campaign is also selling LGBT merchandise on its official website. The novelty items include shirts, posters, stickers and even a $10 “Obama Pride” can holder.

Fundraisers and online merchandise literally a few days after his announcement? This was clearly a pre-planned move on Obama’s part because Mitt Romney is leading him in the polls! Obama has lost support among women, moderates, independent, and voters overall.

It’s about the economy. It’s about the dismal unemployment rate for college kids and the workforce. This baloney was great for cash (Chump change for Obama, really, just $21 million in a week) but will probably hurt him since a majority of voters say this was a calculated move on Obama’s part.

It’s as simple as that.

Autism! Down Syndrome! Curse You, Evil GOP!

The title of this post was inspired by Sean Hannity’s radio show.

From Real Clear Politics:

Obama on the Paul Ryan budget: “We wouldn’t have the capacity to enforce the laws that protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, or the food that we eat. Cuts to the FAA would likely result in more flight cancellations, delays and the complete elimination of air traffic control services in parts of the country. Over time, our weather forecasts would become less accurate because we wouldn’t be able to afford to launch new satellites and that means governors and mayors would have to wait longer to order evacuations in the event of a hurricane. That’s just a partial sampling of the consequences of this budget.”
Source here

Can you say stupid?

Maybe cuts to the FAA would make the president take less 5,000 gallon-trips in Air Force One.

Ah, well, maybe in our dreams.

Also, consequences can mean all effects. So I guess that Obama’s “partial sampling” doesn’t include the positive effects, like, I don’t know, saving money? Eliminating some debt? Making people less dependent?

But I’m full of malarkey, I’m sure. And the President isn’t.

Ahh, the Fresh Stench of Anti-Semitic Progressives! Also, a Message To Anonymous.

One of the latest videos up at Breitbart.tv is a cute little video featuring a man with a British person lecturing a typical dumb American about how you can ‘buy Congress’ and ‘never lose’ by offering ‘tainted money.’ Of course, the only group with this money is apparently AIPAC.

Coupled with the Anonymous video that is against AIPAC as well as a nice post over at HuffPost (which describes Occupiers as “[seeking] to highlight the role of big-money lobbyists in elections while standing in solidarity with the global 99% opposed to Israel’s violations of human rights and international law.”, it is safe to say that the Anti-Zionists have returned! This time, they brought their hacker nerds, as well as the street filth that have been organized purposefully to demolish capitalism. They’ve also got basically everyone who has been misinformed by the media about Israel – one of the few countries out there that has managed to bring democracy, women’s rights, religious freedom, and gay rights – all on an unprecendented scale – into the world. Yet progressives and liberals continue to decry Israel as a bigoted, hateful, unfair, evil nation who is seeking to expand its borders, conquer the world, and impose its thought upon everyone.

I fail to see a single mention by progressives on the decades of peace-treaty violations by Palestinian groups, the Palestinian people, and many bordering nations (i.e. sworn enemies) of Israel.

I fail to see a single mention by progressives on the decades of support that Syria and Iraq received from the USSR in order to combat Israel.

I fail to see a single mention by progressives on the torture and killing of Christians in Lebanon and Egypt for many years.

I fail to see a single mention by progressives on the lack of women’s, human, religious, free-speech, or free-assembly rights in many Middle Eastern, anti-Israeli countries – namely Saudi Arabia and Iran.

I fail to see a single mention by progressives on how the time following the Arab Spring has led to radicals taking control of Egypt (first the military, who ignored old Israeli-Egyptian treaties, then the Muslim Brotherhood, who supports terrorists and terrorist groups) and other countries.

You wanna make change, Anonymous? Or Occupy AIPAC?

Start denouncing the insane people who blow up themselves in martyrdom against one of the freest, democratic countries on Earth.

Start denouncing the ridiculous tactics used by Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist groups to attack Israel – for example, launching missiles from school tops, creating fake propaganda videos, and hiding behind women and children while fighting Israeli soldiers.

Start denouncing the thousands of missiles that have been launched into Israel during times of peace – missiles that have killed Israelis, damaged property and infrastructure, and frightened millions of democracy-practicing Israelis.

Start denouncing the two-facedness of how terrorists from the Palestinean territories will blow themselves up for a phony state but won’t try anything to better their people or communities. And denounce the further two-facedness of the tropical vacations that radical terrorists receive while their own people starve to death.

Start denouncing the fact that a nation that won – and FOUGHT – for its independence cannot even claim their own capital.

You know what, Anonymous and Occupy AIPAC?

EMERGENCY BULLETIN:

Anon and Occupy AIPAC,
You will not escape our wrath that we will dispense with knowledge, facts, morality, defense of democracy, and fairness.

We are anti-Anonymous. We are a legion of peace-loving people. We do forgive. We most certainly do not forget.

Start denouncing your own hypocritical war cry of “We do not forgive! We do not forget!”. If you truly do not forgive or forget, then don’t deny the Holocaust or forgive the radical terrorists who seek to destroy Israel and its allies.

Analysis of Dick Durbin’s Recent Comments, i.e. An Overall Rant

Frankly, sometimes I scratch my head when I hear (lame) liberal logic.

For starters, this quote from Dick Durbin:

Republicans have “consistently said they will refuse to increase the taxes of the wealthiest people of America one penny if that’s what it takes to make sure working families get a payroll tax cut,” Durbin said, calling the refusal to charge a surtax on millionaires a threat to jobs held by teachers, firefighters and policemen.

“What the Republicans offer us is the same formula that brought us into this recession. Cut taxes on the wealthy. And cut that government oversight to make sure we have clean drinking water, air we can breathe, and make sure that wall street doesn’t run Washington, instead of the other way around,” he said.

How in the WORLD did not raising taxes on the wealthy lead to the recession? It was all corruptness in both the government AND the big banks. Once Clinton pressured Fannie and Freddie to give loans to unqualified people, doesn’t anyone else think that the other banks would try to beat Fannie and Freddie to the whole new pool of customers?

Clearly this train of thought is absent among the left. Their (ironic) hatred of the rich seems to be a product of jealousy by those who aren’t as well off.

Not to mention the unions that held up the domestic auto industry in a choke hold - producing crappy cars that couldn’t compete with the imported cars. Thankfully, it’s a little different now, but it’s a long hill for American cars to climb.

There is NO way that taking money from rich people (so they won’t be able to spend it OR invest it) actually HELPS keep the economy going.

We already have government oversight of air/water pollution, along with the Obama administration’s ridiculous goals of having all cars get over 56.2 miles per gallon by 2025. Even if, according to some scientists, that translates to about 37 mpg, it is an almost-impossible task to get Suburbans, Expeditions, F-150s, Silverados, etc. to that kind of a number without sacrificing performance. As if they weren’t expensive enough already!

Aaaaaaaaand the pipeline. Nope. Let’s NOT make jobs because the Democrats don’t want to raise this issue before the elections. Look, if our dependency on oil isn’t going to change soon (which it isn’t, because “green” technologies are both expensive and unreliable), why should we continue to buy oil from countries that hate us and democracy? If these liberal environmentalists love democracy and human rights, why make no moves to stop our dependency on these countries?

What I really love is that this is the picture featured on the article:

It’s over a month old. I guess those protests were really powerful, eh?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/11/republicans-contend-have-dem-support-to-pass-payroll-tax-cut-pipeline-package/?test=latestnews?test=latestnews

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,806 other followers

%d bloggers like this: