• Enter your email address to follow us! You'll get notifications in your inbox.

    Join 2,806 other followers

  • Click to follow Alberto!

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Mike Rowe’s open letter to Mitt Romney. Turns out Obama ignored a similar letter in 2008!

I mean, I’m not surprised that Obama ignored Rowe’s letter four years ago. Mike does a lot of work – you know, with his hands – that people like the President clearly don’t understand.

If, according to Obama, you don’t build your business, then how can you create something with your hands and sweat?

Before I post the letter, let me post a powerful snippet from Rick Santorum’s RNC address (emphasis mine):

I shook the hand of the American Dream. And it has a strong grip.

I shook hands of farmers and ranchers who made America the bread basket of the world. Hands weathered and worn. And proud of it.

I grasped dirty hands with scars that come from years of labor in the oil and gas fields, mines and mills. Hands that power and build America and are stewards of the abundant resources that God has given us.

I gripped hands that work in restaurants and hotels, in hospitals, banks, and grocery stores. Hands that serve and care for all of us.

I clasped hands of men and women in uniform and their families. Hands that sacrifice and risk all to protect and keep us free. And hands that pray for their safe return home.

I held hands that are in want. Hands looking for the dignity of a good job, hands growing weary of not finding one but refusing to give up hope.

And finally, I cradled the little, broken hands of the disabled. Hands that struggle and bring pain, hands that ennoble us and bring great joy.

Here’s Rowe’s letter. Please pass this on. It ties right into what Rick  said quite a while ago: that mandating everyone go to college is snobbery, and that preaching this sort of garbage shows that you have a fundamental misunderstanding of our country, of work, and of the American Dream.

The First Four Years Are The Hardest…

Dear Governor Romney,

My name is Mike Rowe and I own a small company in California called mikeroweWORKS. Currently, mikeroweWORKS is trying to close the country’s skills gap by changing the way Americans feel about Work.  (I know, right? Ambitious.) Anyway, this Labor Day is our 4th anniversary, and I’m commemorating the occasion with an open letter to you. If you read the whole thing, I’ll vote for you in November.

First things first. mikeroweWORKS grew out of a TV show called Dirty Jobs. If by some chance you are not glued to The Discovery Channel every Wednesday at 10pm, allow me to visually introduce myself. That’s me on the right, preparing to do something dirty.When Dirty Jobs premiered back in 2003, critics called the show “a calamity of exploding toilets and misadventures in animal husbandry.” They weren’t exactly wrong. But mostly, Dirty Jobs was an unscripted celebration of hard work and skilled labor. It still is. Every week, we highlight regular people who do the kind of jobs most people go out of their way to avoid. My role on the show is that of a “perpetual apprentice.” In that capacity I have completed over three hundred different jobs, visited all fifty states, and worked in every major industry.Though schizophrenic and void of any actual qualifications, my resume looks pretty impressive, and when our economy officially crapped the bed in 2008, I was perfectly positioned to weigh in on a variety of serious topics. A reporter from The Wall Street Journal called to ask what I thought about the “counter-intuitive correlation between rising unemployment and the growing shortage of skilled labor.” CNBC wanted my take on outsourcing. Fox News wanted my opinions on manufacturing and infrastructure. And CNN wanted to chat about currency valuations, free trade, and just about every other work-related problem under the sun.

In each case, I shared my theory that most of these “problems” were in fact symptoms of something more fundamental – a change in the way Americans viewed hard work and skilled labor. That’s the essence of what I’ve heard from the hundreds of men and women I’ve worked with on Dirty Jobs. Pig farmers, electricians, plumbers, bridge painters, jam makers, blacksmiths, brewers, coal miners, carpenters, crab fisherman, oil drillers…they all tell me the same thing over and over, again and again – our country has become emotionally disconnected from an essential part of our workforce.  We are no longer impressed with cheap electricity, paved roads, and indoor plumbing. We take our infrastructure for granted, and the people who build it.

Today, we can see the consequences of this disconnect in any number of areas, but none is more obvious than the growing skills gap. Even as unemployment remains sky high, a whole category of vital occupations has fallen out of favor, and companies struggle to find workers with the necessary skills. The causes seem clear. We have embraced a ridiculously narrow view of education. Any kind of training or study that does not come with a four-year degree is now deemed “alternative.” Many viable careers once aspired to are now seen as “vocational consolation prizes,” and many of the jobs this current administration has tried to “create” over the last four years are the same jobs that parents and teachers actively discourage kids from pursuing. (I always thought there something ill-fated about the promise of three million “shovel ready jobs” made to a society that no longer encourages people to pick up a shovel.)

Which brings me to my purpose in writing. On Labor Day of 2008, the fans of Dirty Jobs helped me launch this website. mikeroweWORKS.com began as a Trade Resource Center designed to connect kids with careers in the skilled trades. It has since evolved into a non-profit foundation – a kind of PR Campaign for hard work and skilled labor. Thanks to a number of strategic partnerships, I have been able to promote a dialogue around these issues with a bit more credibility than my previous resume allowed. I’ve spoken to Congress (twice) about the need to confront the underlying stigmas and stereotypes that surround these kinds of jobs. Alabama and Georgia have both used mikeroweWORKS to launch their own statewide technical recruitment campaigns, and I’m proud to be the spokesman for both initiatives. I also work closely with Caterpillar, Ford, Kimberly-Clark, and Master Lock, as well as The Boy Scouts of America and The Future Farmers of America. To date, the mikeroweWORKS Foundation has raised over a million dollars for trade scholarships. It’s modest by many standards, but I think we’re making a difference.

Certainly, we need more jobs, and you were clear about that in Tampa. But the Skills Gap proves that we need something else too.  We need people who see opportunity where opportunity exists. We need enthusiasm for careers that have been overlooked and underappreciated by society at large. We need to have a really big national conversation about what we value in the workforce, and if I can be of help to you in that regard, I am at your service – assuming of course, you find yourself in a new address early next year.

To be clear, mikeroweWORKS has no political agenda. I am not an apologist for Organized Labor or for Management. mikeroweWORKS is concerned only with encouraging a larger appreciation for skilled labor, and supporting those kids who are willing to learn a skill.

Good luck in November. And thanks for your time.

Sincerely,

Mike Rowe

PS. In the interest of full disclosure I should mention that I wrote a similar letter to President Obama. Of course, that was four years ago, and since I never heard back, I believe proper etiquette allows me to extend the same offer to you now. I figure if I post it here, the odds are better that someone you know might send it along to your attention.

Really? I didn’t build that?

OMG: Mitt Romney received a shocking amount of money from unions.

First off, though we’ve been tracking union donations to  Super PACs for about half a year, we’ re going to call it quits (and NOT  just because it’s a mathematical and formatting nightmare).

We have found some shocking news.

Check this out, from OpenSecrets.org:

 

So much for “Rick Santorum is a big friend of labor.” That argument was clearly BS.

But what is most shocking is that Mitt Romney has received $1,000 from unions.

Is that too high or too low? Hmm.

Either way, it’s SHOCKING.

While You Were Sleeping, They Plotted. And They Plotted. And They Plotted.

Well, I had posted earlier today about the Romney campaign running circles around the media.

They almost caught us off guard though, folks. Almost.

Turns out the White House and the HHS Department have been quietly dismantling the welfare reform that was passed back in 1996 – you know, the same Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 that was authored by Rick Santorum and signed by Bill Clinton with strong bipartisan support.

This is further proof that President Obama will stop at nothing to dismantle bipartisanship in an effort to score his liberal victories whenever, and wherever, he can.

Secrecy.

Backroom deals and executive orders to trounce Congress.

This is what President Obama and his cronies do.

They must be stopped.

Dear Media, You Are Stupid. PS: Santorum Is Campaigning For Mitt Now!

The media talks about Romney getting booed at the NAACP.

Obama talks about Romney and the SEC, implying Romney is a felon.

So what happens?

Romney and the Drudge Report throw out there that Condi might be his VP choice.

Brilliant media manipulation, as Larry O’Connor put it on the Chris Plante Show this morning. We came out on top with this story that, while true, will lead to NOTHING. We’re not going to pick Condi. Mitt needed a way to run circles around the media. His team finally came out with a strong attack ad that refutes a lot of the garbage that Obama is putting out there. This weekend is now going to be occupied by nothing but this story.

So who might actually get picked?

I’m still saying Jindal, who has an amazing record and is one of the most knowledgeable people on health care.

He has bipartisan experience, he passed great reforms, yadda yadda yadda.

In other news, Rick Santorum is going to hold his first event for Mitt tomorrow.

Coincidental timing? Perhaps, perhaps. I don’t see Mitt going with Rick, even though Rick has geographical advantage – not only in Pennsylvania, but Iowa, a potential swing state where Rick is well-known and well-liked. Rick also has a strong base among conservative voters and rural voters. Why are rural voters important? They can overwhelm those pesky Democrat-leaning cities. Look at Northern Virginia, where I live. Yes, we are leaving no stone unturned in this area. But I think what will decide the election is going to be the rural voters from the western and southern parts of the state. Blacks will most likely be discouraged from voting at all this cycle, so southern Democratic turnout may be lower. With this in mind, all it’s going to take is to get those rural voters who rarely vote to actually go and pull the lever for Mitt. Rick could connect with them, and his strong convictions would be able to help pull them in and vote for someone with similar principles.

Also, I don’t think a sitting senator will be picked, since that would be detrimental to the party overall. So “au revoir,” Kelly Ayotte.

Eeep! Almost time for a #Veep! Comment With Your Pick!

Who should Mitt pick as his running mate?

Hard to say for many, I’m sure.

But I just read two great articles by Quin Hillyer over at The American Spectator. The first tells Mitt that he should definitely consider Santorum on his VP short list.

The second lists a few great picks for VP. I’ve heard Kelly Ayotte thrown around a bit, but she wasn’t on the list. Who was?

  1. Jindal
  2. Kyl
  3. Santorum
  4. Toomey (Again, not too sure. He has definite PA advantages, like being able to reach into rural pockets and neighboring states.)
  5. Ryan (I’d rather leave him in Congress. He is too intelligent to be VP.)
  6. Rubio (I personally think he’s a bad choice)

I LOVE Jindal. Just reading his info over at Wikipedia made me feel good, and the short bio that Quin provided is pretty awesome (emphasis mine):

At age 25 he rescued Louisiana’s state health-care system from Medicaid-induced collapse; he helped forge a national Medicare solution (along Paul Ryan’s later lines) that won over Democratic moderates like John Breaux and Bob Kerrey but fell short when Bill Clinton pulled the plug during the Lewinsky mess; he ran Louisiana’s second-largest system of colleges; he served as the number two guy at the federal Department of Health and Human Services; he served three years in Congress and emerged from Hurricane Katrina as the only Louisiana politician with his stature enhanced by his highly effective responses; and he has been the most successful conservative reformer (and the only re-elected one) ever to serve as Louisiana’s governor. As governor he pushed through some needed ethics reformed, pared state government, kept taxes low, handled the BP oil spill superbly, and pushed through (partly in his first term, partly in his second) a series of education reforms (expanding choice and improving accountability) that, combined, probably outstrip even those of Florida’s Jeb Bush and Wisconsin’s Tommy Thompson as the boldest and best school improvements in modern American history.

He killed corruption, handled two different crises (well, in reality those crises spawned a lot more crises themselves), and has held many different positions in government in his life – giving him unique perspective. A first-generation American, he gets true American values.

Kyl is an interesting choice, too:

Kyl also adds particular heft where Romney has no real record, namely foreign and defense policy. From Kyl’s long service on the Judiciary Committee, he also is well equipped to carry the fight to Obama on the subject of Eric Holder’s corrupt Justice Department, and also to parry attacks on the Supreme Court that Obama is expected to make if the court throws out all or part of Obamacare. With Romney having shown a bit of ineptness in describing legal issues and explaining conservative jurisprudence, Kyl’s abilities here could be tremendously important.

Granted, the article was written before the Obamacare ruling, but, still, Kyl could help our side argue about Obamacare’s legal effects and whatnot. Taxes are complicated, you know.

A final serious listed choice is, of course, Rick Santorum. I’ll cite a bigger chunk of the article for y’all because I was a hefty Santorum supporter for a long time and I believe he’d be an awesome pick.

It is astonishing that Santorum isn’t somewhere near the top of every Veep list. As has been the case during his whole career, conventional wisdom badly underestimates his appeal. Never mind the millions of votes he won this winter. Never mind the numerous state primaries and caucuses he won despite being woefully underfunded and discounted. It’s crazy. Every single polling cross-tab I’ve seen has shown that while Mitt Romney does enjoy majority or plurality support among Evangelicals and blue-collar workers, the support is shallow and tepid — and those are the very constituencies to whom Santorum appeals the most. Romney desperately needs their energy. He also should understand that a lot of Santorum voters will feel ignored, marginalized, indeed insulted, if their candidate isn’t at least publicly listed among the final three choices even after effectively having been Romney’s runner-up.

It also should help that Santorum has been publicly vetted. There is nothing negative about Santorum that hasn’t already come out. People already have factored in his supposed deficiencies. There aren’t any jokers remaining in the deck. And even the people who don’t like him give him credit for being sincere and honorable — factors that severely mitigate the chance of many people voting against a ticket based merely on distaste for the bottom half of the ticket.

Santorum has foreign policy experience (especially with Iran), had a strong presence among Reagan Democrats and rural voters, and has been previously vetted extensively. It adds up.

There you have it: 3 great picks. Santorum would be a bit of a game changer, according to Quin, while Jindal and Kyl would be picks if Romney is on more solid ground. I think Jindal would be the best, but we’ll see what Mitt does. Let me know who you think would be a good VP pick by commenting below!

REMEMBER: #WeWillWin

Give Me Your “Fair Share” of Pageviews

Seriously, why do we all keep saying “fair share” in regards to the Buffett Rule? To make the rich pay even higher rates? Or  is  was the Buffett Rule just designed to stop those several hundred people who escape taxes with strange loopholes? I’m not sure what “fair” refers to, but it sounds like some Marxist sound bite.

See, this is why I supported Rick’s tax plan. It called for almost all deductions to be eliminated – after all, deductions favor the rich. And while I’m not one to always dwell in the past, I do find myself taking a liking to Lisa Graas’ Operation Delaware.

And here is a cool post I just found.

Let’s go, patriots! As I said before, Rick might win at least 8 or 9 more states – especially since a lot of would-be Romney voters will stay at home. I’m sure they figure that their vote will not matter. of course, this thinking is always faulty. I hope they do think that way though. We need a conservative platform this election cycle, and we need to deliver a conservative message everywhere, up and down the ticket.

Who We Really Trade With. Support American Cars! Die, Toyota!

Trade is by its very nature a reciprocal activity. Not surprisingly, the United States’ top nine trading partners, established by adding both exports to them to imports received from them, are also in the top 15 of export and of import viewed separately. These countries are (arranged by total trade volume) Canada, Mexico, China, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, South Korea, France, and Taiwan.

Emphasis mine. Source here.

Just some more proof that it’s better if we buy our cars from US auto companies, even if they use parts from – or are assembled – in our fellow NAFTA countries. We share bigger trade ties with Canada and Mexico than any other country.

So long, Toyota. I’ll stick with GM and Ford.

I can’t wait for you dumb troglodytes (no offense, Lance) to say I’m a Big Labor supporter. As if! It’s a lesser of two evils – Korean/Japanese workers? Or a bunch of American labor workers who, half the time, are in a union only because of pushy leaders or dumb non-right-to-work states?

Exactly. Get on the winning side – being pro-American cars but fiercely against pro-labor laws and the feds remaining in control of GM. Otherwise, Jimmy Hoffa Jr. will win over the public opinion.

My previous pieces on this sort of issue are here (which was a response to Smitty’s evil post), as well as here.

Mitt isn’t on Detroit’s side, so you’d better be.

You Can’t Buy Santorum Supporters. Religion Hurts?

Lisa Graas is right. Maggie Gallagher can’t be bought.

And neither can conservatives or Santorum supporters.

This is what Maggie Gallagher wrote in the National Review:

Look, independents are independents and not Democrats or Republicans, because they don’t vote on the social issues. If they voted on abortion or gay marriage, they would be in one of those two parties.
Democrats are betting they can scare independents by painting Santorum as an extremist for being a faithful Catholic. I don’t think it’s going to work. The odds it works are less than that the Democrats will exploit anti-Mormon bigotry in the fall.

Spot-on. However, a lot of voters (almost one-fifth) do believe that Mormonism is a deal-breaker. We even have Republicans who vote accordingly.

You KNOW the Democrats will jump at the bit to use that against Mitt. They already have!
But – 25% of the electorate is Catholic. Good news for Rick Santorum, if people will consider religion as a factor in November.

NEWS: A Week Without Media Lies

I know, one wouldn’t think this to be possible.

However, Rick Santorum will be taking a break from the campaign trail until Monday, April 9.

All the dumb conspiracy theorists/people eager to aid in the re-election of Obama will just say this is because Rick will assess how he is going to lose the nomination and will just decide to “line up” or “coalesce” behind Mitt Romney and exit the race in a “respectable fashion.”

Personally, I think his campaign needs to reorganize, and turn into a more lethal fighting machine. He also deserves a break – he’s only taken 5 days off the trail since last June. Considering it’s a holiday for him, it’s a great time for a break.


Pennsylvania, here we come. The heat’s being turned up on Romney, but not Santorum:

“If there was a poll tomorrow that said Americans wanted a Rastafarian for president, Mitt Romney would have dreadlocks by the end of the day,” said state Sen. Daylin Leach (D., Montgomery), referring to frequent criticism that the former governor has changed positions. Again, no mention of Santorum.

Source here

For those unfamiliar with Rastafarians, click here for a definition. Think Marley.

But, as I’ve been stressing: If the Dems focus on Romney, but we nominate Santorum, we have just ELIMINATED 12 months of anti-Romney work being done by the left. A YEAR of attacks – gone. The shorter we make the general election, the better for us.

Delegate Math Revealed! Use Your Brains, Vote Rick!

My good friend (if by “friend” you mean “I barely know her”) Lisa Graas just posted a piece talking abut how Romney’s campaign will never deny that he supported the mandate.

Because he used to claim that the mandate was a conservative idea.

Which is Barack’s main point in his ObamaRomneyCare bill.

So Barack is, according to MittWillard, gaining Conservative Points. We could even make a tally, with a scoreboard! Hmm… Let’s see… A flip-flop counts as half a point… Carry the two… Well, to sum it up, Obama has only one Conservative Point.

Unfortunately, we have to take into account the weight system here. You didn’t think this would be easy, did you?

Five hermit crabs times 12.99 for a bouquet of roses, add that to the cost of gas ($4 per gallon – or, in the near future, quart)… rationalize the denominator…. Ahh, I give up! Let’s just give Obama a random number – 6. Sounds about right.

By the way, that’s how they do delegate math over at the Associated Press.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,806 other followers

%d bloggers like this: