• Enter your email address to follow us! You'll get notifications in your inbox.

    Join 2,806 other followers

  • Click to follow Alberto!

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

More Media Distortions. Ho Hum.

From Yahoo:

So what does a Romney budget mean for our country?

“Big cuts to many basic services.”

Really? Which basic services does the federal government provide to me? Oh, right, none.

“Guns over butter.”

Sounds like some more malarkey.

And then, on the side, “A GOP ‘reign of terror’”.

I don’t even want to know.

Followed by “Obama’s war chest” – They just can’t wait to make Obama’s numbers look good, huh?


For starters, the Obama war chest page screams the following headline (from AP, no less):

Obama enjoys 10-1 financial edge over Romney, having amassed $104M war chest for election

But… Romney is so rich, he can’t relate to the American people, and he will just buy the election with his rich Republican backers! Pfft.


Guns over butter article:

Reducing government deficits Mitt Romney’s way would mean less money for health care for the poor and disabled and big cuts to nuts-and-bolts functions such as food inspection, border security and education.

None of this is backed by actual facts, but, hey, it’s the media. Poor and disabled people losing money. Gee, you know, how about we tackle that 100 trillion in unfunded liabilities? Or perhaps we set caps on who can cash in on Medicare/Medicaid based on your retirement salary/savings?

Food inspection cuts? Obviously, we need to make this all more efficient. To say the GOP will reduce food safety standards is absurd. Something I’d expect out of a lying liberal teacher, not people with brains.

Border security?! Well, if we create some more unmanned systems, then, yes, we would need to hire less people. The borders are a winning issue for the GOP, this attack is just trying to change the GOP’s position. Of course, it’s a dumb point, but this article looks a lot like a short talking-points card for liberals to carry.

Education? We’ve been increasing education funding since the 70′s – in fact, education spending is much greater than military spending. Yet liberals fail to see that there is no correlation between increased education spending and higher performance levels. Again, facts are irrelevant for the left..

Obama’s budget generally avoids risk, with minimal cuts to rapidly growing health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid while socking wealthier people with tax increases. It’s all part of an effort to close trillion-dollar-plus deficits.

Little do they know that Obama’s budget actually increases the deficit. I happen to trust the CBO more than the White House, who fudges the unemployment numbers.

You can go ahead and read the article yourself. It gets a little better, but then it ends by citing some ridiculous leftist saying that the American public just can’t handle the truth of the Romney and Ryan budgets – you know, since we need the federal government to hold our hands when we cross the street.

Except at the other end of the street is the Suicide Cliff. It’s time America wakes up and tackles our problems. Or we will not survive as a country.

RESPONSE to Katie Kieffer’s Post. Will She Approve It?

UPDATE: It appears as though the comment was approved, but a dumb troll commented on my comment. Sigh. I give up.

None of the article seems to make much sense upon analysis, tell me what you think.

Her article here: http://katiekieffer.com/2012/02/27/how-santorum-fails-constitution-101

My comment, which has yet to be posted, is here:

There are a “few” flaws with this post. I won’t cover them all, but I’ll cover some.

Santorum spoke out AGAINST the MDAA. I see Santorum saying that because we killed Al-Awlaki – a massive overreach – that we will be wiling to hit foreigners at any cost, too. I don’t see him endorsing treating Americans as foreign terrorists.
It IS the president’s duty to lead our military – he is our commander-in-chief. He should not declare war, no, but he does decide the direction of our foreign policy. In fact, for 60 days, he controls troop deployment himself. I see zero overreach of power. NONE.

It’s really funny how you say Rick’s foreign policy is like Obama’s. Most of the time during debates, he’s been hitting Obama’s foreign policy repeatedly. He doesn’t have similar stances. To say so is ignorant.

You say “Reuters reports that Santorum once supported a bill that made exceptions for legal abortion…but…he switched…” Which bill? Can you link to the article? Did he vote for the bill? Was the abortion part of the bill just a part, or the main focus? Santorum has said that from the moment he sat down and learned about abortion, he’s been against it (except in the case of the mother’s health). The mess you make of the paragraph about birth control is mind boggling: You say he pivoted on the religious freedom argument, but the quote attached talks about how he voted for a bill that included Title X. What?

He agrees women have a RIGHT to contraception, but he opposed federal funding for it. The Title X flub was explained in the last debate; if you watched, you would know that he passed, in counter-action to Title X, Title XX. Go research (I know, the thought is troubling: Citing other bloggers isn’t research).

The states have a right to ban contraception, just like ANY OTHER THING. They can deem something as being illegal to sell. Contraband, anyone?
Will they? Most likely not. But they have the right.

You also say Santorum doesn’t seem to think individuals own their own homes. Besides the fact that you don’t cite a quote, this is yet another of your ridiculous outstretches. In fact, in most cases, people don’t own their homes – banks do. But your idea that Santorum doesn’t support people owning their own homes is just ridiculous. A new low, really.

We aren’t an example of radical individualism because we’re really a group. We’re all in groups. And we can’t make decisions for ourselves without considering any effects on others. A radical individualist society would allow everyone to smoke pot, kill others, and not pay for Social Security. Doesn’t sound like the America I know.

The bigamy comment is another thing you stretch, just like the media. He’s saying that if the government allows you to have “consensual sex,” they’re letting you do anything in your own home. Correct. But he doesn’t think things like incest or polygamy should be allowed. THE HORROR! Have fun with your cousin, I guess.

Ah, once again, you hit Santorum on Arlen Specter. Gee, I guess you didn’t watch the debate. Or maybe you did, but only watched the Ron Paul segments, since you quoted Paul. This is the same, overused argument against Santorum, and it’s frankly losing steam. He’s said that it was more important for him to get those justices approved than anything else – I, and a lot of American people, agree. You can’t always pick the person who shares your beliefs in one particular, less-important issue. First you downplay Santorum’s abortion stances and say he’s ridiculous, then you play the same thing up by emphasizing Specter’s pro-choice stance. Hypocrisy.

Oh, look, another quote. Out of context, as usual. Yawn. I see Rick saying that he will get involved as supporting traditional marriage. You score a point because he does support a Federal Marriage Amendment. I’m not quite sure where he’s said specifically that he wants to repeal the 10th Amendment (or that he doesn’t support the 1st amendment – which is a hilarious claim you make), but perhaps you could cite another “source.” It should be easy to conjure up, especially if you use the Ron Paul Spellbook for Magical World Happiness.

The spending part of this post doesn’t seem to challenge any sort of constitutionality of anything. Rather, it looks like a rider. Ironic.
IMF funding? Oh no, I can’t believe he would do that! That’s so evil. We can’t send money to support good countries.
The other votes he can, and should, explain. Of course, let’s just hope you actually listen through some unbiased ears this time.

Great use of pictures though! It seems to be your forte.

In other news, we begin filming for our first video today!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,806 other followers

%d bloggers like this: